SiteClick vs CrewView

SiteClick vs CrewView — dispatch plus proper photo docs and H&S paperwork.

CrewView users usually love the clock-in flow but end up bolting on WhatsApp, Dropbox and Word templates for everything else. SiteClick keeps the crew management and pulls all of that into one place.

Best for

Contractors who want crew scheduling and clock-ins but are tired of running photos, RAMS and client updates in separate tools.

Why teams switch from CrewView

— No native photo timeline — you still end up in WhatsApp or Dropbox.
— No RAMS, toolbox talk or CDM 2015 templates.
— No RFI or drawing version control.
— No client-facing portal for progress sharing.

Feature comparison

Feature	SiteClick	CrewView
GPS clock-in / clock-out	Yes	Yes
Weekly dispatch board	Yes	Yes
GPS-tagged photo timeline	Yes	No
AI photo tagging & voice notes	Yes	No
Floor-plan pinning	Yes	No
RAMS, toolbox talks & permits	Yes	No
RFIs & drawing versioning	Yes	No
Client portal	Yes	No
Daily reports with weather	Yes	Basic
Job costing (labour + materials)	Yes	Basic

Pricing side-by-side

Plan	SiteClick	CrewView
Solo (1 user)	£13 / month	Per-seat, POA
Team (5 users)	£33 / month	Per-seat, POA
Extra seat	£9 / user	Per-seat, POA

Competitor pricing is our best-effort snapshot in £; check their site for the live figure.

The UK edge

GPS-tagged photo timeline with AI tagging and voice notes.
Floor-plan pinning so a photo lives where it happened on the drawing.
RAMS, toolbox talks, permits and inductions with digital signatures.
RFIs and drawing version control per project.
Public client portal with tokenised progress links.

Verdict

If all you need is clock-ins and a whiteboard, CrewView is fine. If you also want the photo audit trail, RAMS pack and client updates in one login, SiteClick does the whole lot.